AMD Radeon R9 M390 versus AMD Radeon HD 7790
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M390 and AMD Radeon HD 7790 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M390
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 20526 versus 14832
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.394 versus 40.763
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 881.959 versus 828.247
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.028 versus 3.646
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 73.782 versus 63.284
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 241.868 versus 217.744
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6227 versus 5087
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1232 versus 988
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 versus 2061
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6227 versus 5087
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1232 versus 988
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 versus 2061
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 09 June 2015 versus 22 March 2013 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20526 versus 14832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 versus 40.763 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 versus 828.247 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 versus 3.646 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 versus 63.284 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 versus 217.744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 versus 5087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1232 versus 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 2061 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 versus 5087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1232 versus 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 2061 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M390
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7790
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M390 | AMD Radeon HD 7790 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20526 | 14832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 | 40.763 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 | 828.247 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 | 3.646 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 | 63.284 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 | 217.744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 | 5087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1232 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 2061 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 | 5087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1232 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 2061 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3090 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 459 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 M390 | AMD Radeon HD 7790 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Pitcairn | Bonaire |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series |
| Date de sortie | 09 June 2015 | 22 March 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 803 | 820 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Prix maintenant | $134.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 29.57 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,792 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | |
| Pipelines | 896 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 56 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 183 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |

