AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 425 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 90 nm
Launch date | 8 August 2016 vs 22 December 2003 |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 425 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 90 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S
- 6.4x lower typical power consumption: 11 Watt vs 70 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 11 Watt vs 70 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S
Name | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65217 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1730 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 970.421 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.656 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 237.944 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 24 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 265 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Curie |
Code name | Baffin | MCP51 |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 8 August 2016 | 22 December 2003 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | |
Place in performance rating | 673 | 676 |
Price now | $179.50 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 26.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Compute units | 14 | |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 425 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2.2 TFLOPs | |
GPU Power | 35-48 Watt | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | |
Stream Processors | 896 | |
Texture fill rate | 66.08 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 11 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 75 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCI |
Laptop size | large | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 9.0c |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0 | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |