AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1090 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 102.628 vs 55
- Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1762.559 vs 970.421
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.26 vs 4.656
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 86.313 vs 76.881
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 617.099 vs 237.944
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 vs 8 August 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1090 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.628 vs 55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1762.559 vs 970.421 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.26 vs 4.656 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.313 vs 76.881 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 617.099 vs 237.944 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 4.1x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1704 MHz
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 65217 vs 23264
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1704 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65217 vs 23264 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4654 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23264 | 65217 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.628 | 55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1762.559 | 970.421 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.26 | 4.656 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.313 | 76.881 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 617.099 | 237.944 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1177 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1724 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1177 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1724 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1730 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Vega 10 | Baffin |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 | 8 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 671 | 673 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | |
Price now | $179.50 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 26.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1090 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 70 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 3,000 million |
Compute units | 14 | |
Floating-point performance | 2.2 TFLOPs | |
GPU Power | 35-48 Watt | |
Pipelines | 896 | |
Stream Processors | 896 | |
Texture fill rate | 66.08 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Laptop size | large | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 1704 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0 | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |