AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon HD 7690M XT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) and AMD Radeon HD 7690M XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 926 MHz vs 725 MHz
- 8.9x more texture fill rate: 154.4 GTexel / s vs 17.4 GTexel / s
- 4.3x more pipelines: 2048 vs 480
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 83% higher memory clock speed: 6600 MHz vs 3600 MHz
- 7.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7977 vs 1009
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 552
- 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33718 vs 8800
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 August 2016 vs 7 January 2013 |
Core clock speed | 926 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 154.4 GTexel / s vs 17.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 480 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz vs 3600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7977 vs 1009 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 vs 552 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33718 vs 8800 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7690M XT
- 142x better floating-point performance: 696.0 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs
- 4.8x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 120 Watt
Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7690M XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon HD 7690M XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7977 | 1009 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | 552 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33718 | 8800 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1674 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1674 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 839 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon HD 7690M XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Terascale 2 |
Code name | Ellesmere | Thames |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 4 August 2016 | 7 January 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Place in performance rating | 396 | 397 |
Price now | $109.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 100.00 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1206 MHz | |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 926 MHz | 725 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4.9 TFLOPs | 696.0 gflops |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 480 |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 154.4 GTexel / s | 17.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 211 GB/s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |