NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1076 MHz vs 926 MHz
• Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1206 MHz
• 618.6x better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs
• Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
• Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 6% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 6600 MHz
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 113.416 vs 111.543
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10251 vs 9983
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3681 vs 2443
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3316 vs 1674
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10251 vs 9983
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3681 vs 2443
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3316 vs 1674
• 3.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2958 vs 835

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)

• Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 154.4 GTexel / s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
• 2.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 768
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7979 vs 6952
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 632
• Around 47% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33724 vs 22927
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1817.005 vs 1414.794
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.511 vs 6.736
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.875 vs 81.206
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 511.362 vs 417.823

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6952 7979
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	632 724
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	22927 33724
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	113.416 111.543
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1414.794 1817.005
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.736 9.511
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	81.206 99.875
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	417.823 511.362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10251 9983
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3681 2443
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3316 1674
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10251 9983
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3681 2443
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3316 1674
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2958 835

Compare specifications (specs)