AMD Radeon RX 550 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 993 MHz
- Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 37.86 GTexel / s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 64 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 vs 1469
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 349
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11610 vs 4271
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.507 vs 11.994
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 291.627
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 vs 1.023
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 vs 15.139
- 6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 vs 23.651
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 vs 1790
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 vs 1790
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 29 May 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 993 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel / s vs 31.78 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 64 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 vs 1469 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 vs 349 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 vs 4271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 vs 11.994 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 vs 291.627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 vs 1.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 vs 15.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 vs 23.651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 vs 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 vs 2153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 vs 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 vs 2153 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
- 635.5x better floating-point performance: 762.6 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1427 vs 940
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1427 vs 940
- 4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 513 vs 127
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1427 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1427 vs 940 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 513 vs 127 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 | 1469 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 349 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 | 4271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | 11.994 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | 291.627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | 1.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | 15.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | 23.651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | 2153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | 2153 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 | 513 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Lexa | GK107 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 29 May 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | $89 |
Place in performance rating | 876 | 1270 |
Price now | $75 | $94.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.51 | 18.87 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 993 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | 762.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel / s | 31.78 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 64 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 145 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |