AMD Radeon RX 550 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 550 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 550
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1100 MHz versus 993 MHz
- Environ 19% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 37.86 GTexel / s versus 31.78 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 28% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 64 Watt
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 40% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 versus 1469
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 versus 349
- 2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11610 versus 4271
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.507 versus 11.994
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 versus 291.627
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 versus 1.023
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 versus 15.139
- 6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 versus 23.651
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 versus 1790
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 versus 1790
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 29 May 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz versus 993 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 37.86 GTexel / s versus 31.78 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 64 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 versus 1469 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 versus 349 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 versus 4271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 versus 11.994 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 versus 291.627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 versus 1.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 versus 15.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 versus 23.651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 versus 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 versus 2153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 versus 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 versus 2153 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
- 635.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 762.6 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1427 versus 940
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1427 versus 940
- 4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 513 versus 127
Caractéristiques | |
Performance á point flottant | 762.6 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1427 versus 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1427 versus 940 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 513 versus 127 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 | 1469 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 349 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 | 4271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | 11.994 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | 291.627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | 1.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | 15.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | 23.651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | 2153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | 2153 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 | 513 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Lexa | GK107 |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 29 May 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | $89 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 876 | 1270 |
Prix maintenant | $75 | $94.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.51 | 18.87 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1183 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz | 993 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1.2 TFLOPs | 762.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 37.86 GTexel / s | 31.78 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 64 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,200 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | 145 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |