AMD Radeon RX 550 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 51% higher texture fill rate: 37.86 GTexel / s vs 25.1 billion / sec
- 2.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 192
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 106 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.9x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 vs 1322
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 310
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11610 vs 4907
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.507 vs 14.758
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 302.509
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 vs 0.965
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 vs 14.925
- 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 vs 27.656
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 vs 2160
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 vs 2160
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 13 September 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel / s vs 25.1 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 512 vs 192 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 106 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 vs 1322 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 vs 310 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 vs 4907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 vs 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 vs 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 vs 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 vs 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 vs 27.656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 vs 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 vs 2160 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1566 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 501.1x better floating-point performance: 601.3 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3365 vs 940
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 2158
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3365 vs 940
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 2158
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1566 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 601.3 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3365 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 vs 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3365 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 vs 2158 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 | 1322 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 310 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 | 4907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | 27.656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | 3325 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Lexa | GF106 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 13 September 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | $129 |
Place in performance rating | 876 | 1130 |
Price now | $75 | $64.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.51 | 26.46 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1566 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | 601.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel / s | 25.1 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 106 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 1,170 million |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 57.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |