AMD Radeon RX 550 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550 and NVIDIA Quadro 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• 2.3x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 475 MHz
• 2.5x more texture fill rate: 37.86 GTexel / s vs 15.2 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 512 vs 256
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 142 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 2.5x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 2808 MHz
• Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 vs 1476
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 382
• 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11610 vs 5013
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.507 vs 13.345
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 306.122
• Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 vs 1.552
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 vs 20.453
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 vs 39.651
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 vs 2079
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 vs 2079

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000

• 405.3x better floating-point performance: 486.4 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
• 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3472 vs 940
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 2158
• 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3472 vs 940
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 2158

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2690 1476
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 382
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11610 5013
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.507 13.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1037.305 306.122
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.064 1.552
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	52.533 20.453
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	140.911 39.651
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4485 2079
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	940 3472
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2158 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4485 2079
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	940 3472
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2158 3350

Compare specifications (specs)