AMD Radeon RX 550 versus NVIDIA Quadro 4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 550 and NVIDIA Quadro 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 550
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 5 mois plus tard
- 2.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1100 MHz versus 475 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 37.86 GTexel / s versus 15.2 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 512 versus 256
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 142 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 2.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 2808 MHz
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 versus 1476
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 versus 382
- 2.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11610 versus 5013
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.507 versus 13.345
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 versus 306.122
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 versus 1.552
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 versus 20.453
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 versus 39.651
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 versus 2079
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 versus 2079
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 2 November 2010 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz versus 475 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 37.86 GTexel / s versus 15.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 versus 256 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 142 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 2808 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 versus 1476 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 versus 382 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 versus 5013 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 versus 13.345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 versus 306.122 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 versus 1.552 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 versus 20.453 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 versus 39.651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 versus 2079 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 versus 2079 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 4000
- 405.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 486.4 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3472 versus 940
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 versus 2158
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3472 versus 940
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 versus 2158
Caractéristiques | |
Performance á point flottant | 486.4 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3472 versus 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 versus 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3472 versus 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 versus 2158 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA Quadro 4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 | 1476 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 382 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 | 5013 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | 13.345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | 306.122 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | 1.552 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | 20.453 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | 39.651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | 2079 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | 3472 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | 2079 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | 3472 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA Quadro 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Lexa | GF100 |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 2 November 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | $1,199 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 876 | 1047 |
Prix maintenant | $75 | $141.66 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.51 | 17.08 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1183 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz | 475 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1.2 TFLOPs | 486.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 256 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 37.86 GTexel / s | 15.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 142 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,200 million | 3,100 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | 241 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 89.9 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 2808 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |