AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT and NVIDIA Quadro P4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1202 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1845 MHz vs 1480 MHz
- 979.5x more texture fill rate: 162.4 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 84% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 7604 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 44854 vs 42289
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2024.814 vs 1590.392
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.328 vs 11.365
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 125.474 vs 45.977
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Dec 2019 vs 6 February 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1202 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz vs 1480 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 162.4 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 7604 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44854 vs 42289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2024.814 vs 1590.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.328 vs 11.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.474 vs 45.977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- Around 27% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1408
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11653 vs 9160
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 827 vs 784
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.325 vs 128.135
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 751.626 vs 742.778
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15267 vs 11075
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15267 vs 11075
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1408 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11653 vs 9160 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 827 vs 784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 vs 128.135 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 vs 742.778 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 vs 11075 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 vs 11075 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4904 vs 4894 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9160 | 11653 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 | 827 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44854 | 42289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 128.135 | 152.325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2024.814 | 1590.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.328 | 11.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.474 | 45.977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 742.778 | 751.626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11075 | 15267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11075 | 15267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4894 | 4904 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 14 | GP104 |
Launch date | 12 Dec 2019 | 6 February 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | $815 |
Place in performance rating | 288 | 275 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Workstation |
Price now | $799.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.17 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 1202 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 324.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.39 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.196 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 59.04 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 162.4 GTexel/s | 165.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 5,304 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 7.09 inches (180 mm) | 241 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 192 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 7604 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
3D Stereo | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |