AMD Radeon RX 5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500 and NVIDIA Quadro P5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1670 MHz vs 1607 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1845 MHz vs 1733 MHz
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 747 vs 673
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3409
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3077
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3409
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3077
- 3.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4813 vs 1330
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 vs 1 October 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1670 MHz vs 1607 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz vs 1733 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 747 vs 673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3077 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4813 vs 1330 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5000
- Around 71% higher texture fill rate: 277.3 GTexel / s vs 162.36 GT/s
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12640 vs 8785
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52508 vs 44380
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15489 vs 12069
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15489 vs 12069
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 277.3 GTexel / s vs 162.36 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12640 vs 8785 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52508 vs 44380 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15489 vs 12069 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15489 vs 12069 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5500 | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8785 | 12640 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 747 | 673 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44380 | 52508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12069 | 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12069 | 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3077 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4813 | 1330 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 223.558 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2698.914 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.206 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.845 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 927.006 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5500 | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Pascal |
Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 | 1 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 259 | 247 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Code name | GP104 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Price now | $1,699.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.38 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1670 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.4 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.2 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 59 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 1408 | |
Texture fill rate | 162.36 GT/s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 192 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
3D Stereo | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Shader Model | 5.1 |