AMD Radeon RX 5500 vs NVIDIA Tesla T4
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500 and NVIDIA Tesla T4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 1670 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1845 MHz vs 1515 MHz
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 737 vs 594
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 1976
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 1781
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 1976
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 1781
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 vs 13 September 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1670 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz vs 1515 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 737 vs 594 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 1781 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T4
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10751 vs 8781
- Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 vs 44388
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 vs 12069
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 vs 12069
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10751 vs 8781 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 vs 44388 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 vs 12069 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 vs 12069 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5500 | NVIDIA Tesla T4 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8781 | 10751 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 737 | 594 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44388 | 61276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12069 | 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12069 | 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 1781 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4813 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5500 | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Turing |
Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 | 13 September 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 270 | 268 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Code name | TU104 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1670 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.4 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.2 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 59 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 1408 | |
Texture fill rate | 162.36 GT/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 13,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin | None |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 |