NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX 5500

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and AMD Radeon RX 5500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

AMD Radeon RX 5500

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
850x more texture fill rate: 138.0 GTexel/s vs 162.36 GT/s
Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 150 Watt
Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10166 vs 8781
Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 750 vs 737
Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55744 vs 44388
Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 vs 12069
Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 vs 12069

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	22 Nov 2019 vs 7 Oct 2019
Texture fill rate	138.0 GTexel/s vs 162.36 GT/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt vs 150 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	10166 vs 8781
PassMark - G2D Mark	750 vs 737
Geekbench - OpenCL	55744 vs 44388
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	13569 vs 12069
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357 vs 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	13569 vs 12069
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357 vs 3351

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500

Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1670 MHz vs 1530 MHz
Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1845 MHz vs 1725 MHz
Around 3% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4813 vs 4659

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1670 MHz vs 1530 MHz
Boost clock speed	1845 MHz vs 1725 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717 vs 3715
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	4813 vs 4659

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5500

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

10166

8781

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

750

737

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

55744

44388

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13569

12069

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3717

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

3351

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13569

12069

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3717

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

3351

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

4659

4813

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	AMD Radeon RX 5500
PassMark - G3D Mark	10166	8781
PassMark - G2D Mark	750	737
Geekbench - OpenCL	55744	44388
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	178.014
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1961.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	11.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	109.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	787.025
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	13569	12069
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357	3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	13569	12069
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357	3351
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	4659	4813

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	AMD Radeon RX 5500
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	RDNA
Code name	TU116
Launch date	22 Nov 2019	7 Oct 2019
Place in performance rating	269	270
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1725 MHz	1845 MHz
Core clock speed	1530 MHz	1670 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	138.0 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	8.832 TFLOPS (2:1)	10.4 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.416 TFLOPS	5.2 TFLOPs
Pipelines	1280
Pixel fill rate	55.20 GPixel/s	59 GP/s
Texture fill rate	138.0 GTexel/s	162.36 GT/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt	150 Watt
Transistor count	6600 million	6400 million
Compute units		22
Stream Processors		1408
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort
DisplayPort support
HDMI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	9 inches (229 mm)
Recommended system power (PSU)	350 Watt	550 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1 x 8-pin
Width	Dual-slot
API support
DirectX	12.1
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	224 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 bit
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Technologies
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support