AMD Radeon RX 5500M vs AMD FirePro W8100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500M and AMD FirePro W8100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 76% higher core clock speed: 1448 MHz vs 824 MHz
- Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 144.76 GT/s vs 131.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38100 vs 34705
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11058 vs 5494
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11058 vs 5494
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 vs 23 June 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1448 MHz vs 824 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 144.76 GT/s vs 131.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38100 vs 34705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11058 vs 5494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11058 vs 5494 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W8100
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7333 vs 3166
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 727 vs 336
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 3617
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 3617
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7333 vs 3166 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 727 vs 336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 vs 3617 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 3345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 vs 3617 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 3345 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W8100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5500M | AMD FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3166 | 7333 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 | 727 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38100 | 34705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11058 | 5494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3617 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 | 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11058 | 5494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3617 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 | 3349 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4223 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 93.339 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2333.922 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.816 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.45 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 440.107 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 5500M | AMD FirePro W8100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | GCN 2.0 |
| Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 | 23 June 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 397 | 395 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Code name | Hawaii | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz | |
| Compute units | 22 | |
| Core clock speed | 1448 MHz | 824 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.26 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.63 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 52.6 GP/s | |
| Stream Processors | 1408 | |
| Texture fill rate | 144.76 GT/s | 131.8 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 6,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 279 mm | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HD сomponent video output | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 5500M with others
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 550v
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
AMDFirePro W8100
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3000
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
AMDRadeon Pro 575X
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000
