AMD Radeon RX 5500M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500M and NVIDIA Quadro T1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1448 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38059 vs 32981
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11058 vs 9009
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11058 vs 9009
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 vs 27 May 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1448 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38059 vs 32981 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11058 vs 9009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11058 vs 9009 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- 482.5x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 144.76 GT/s
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6466 vs 3166
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 416 vs 336
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3617
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3617
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s vs 144.76 GT/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6466 vs 3166 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 416 vs 336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3617 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3617 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3345 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5500M | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3166 | 6466 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 | 416 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38059 | 32981 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11058 | 9009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3617 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11058 | 9009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3617 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4223 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 5500M | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | Turing |
| Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 397 | 398 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile Workstation |
| Code name | TU117 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Compute units | 22 | |
| Core clock speed | 1448 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.26 TFLOPs | 4.470 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.63 TFLOPs | 2.235 TFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate | 52.6 GP/s | 46.56 GPixel/s |
| Stream Processors | 1408 | |
| Texture fill rate | 144.76 GT/s | 69.84 GTexel/s |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 4700 million |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin | None |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 128 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 5500M with others
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 550v
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
AMDRadeon R9 280X
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
AMDFirePro W8100
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
AMDRadeon Pro 575X
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000
