AMD Radeon RX 5500M vs AMD Radeon R9 370

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500M and AMD Radeon R9 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon RX 5500M

AMD Radeon R9 370

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500M

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 57% higher core clock speed: 1448 MHz vs 925 MHz
Around 69% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 975 MHz
Around 86% higher texture fill rate: 144.76 GT/s vs 78 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11058 vs 6096
Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11058 vs 6096

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	7 Oct 2019 vs 5 May 2015
Core clock speed	1448 MHz vs 925 MHz
Boost clock speed	1645 MHz vs 975 MHz
Texture fill rate	144.76 GT/s vs 78 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11058 vs 6096
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11058 vs 6096

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370

Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4722 vs 3166
2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 781 vs 336
Around 95% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75346 vs 38690
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3617
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3617

Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	4722 vs 3166
PassMark - G2D Mark	781 vs 336
Geekbench - OpenCL	75346 vs 38690
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3617
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357 vs 3345
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3617
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357 vs 3345

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 370

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3166

4722

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

336

781

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

38690

75346

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11058

6096

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3617

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3345

3357

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11058

6096

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3617

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3345

3357

Name	AMD Radeon RX 5500M	AMD Radeon R9 370
PassMark - G3D Mark	3166	4722
PassMark - G2D Mark	336	781
Geekbench - OpenCL	38690	75346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11058	6096
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3617	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3345	3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11058	6096
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3617	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3345	3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	4223	0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		64.576
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		336.491

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 5500M	AMD Radeon R9 370
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA	GCN 1.0
Launch date	7 Oct 2019	5 May 2015
Place in performance rating	390	404
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Code name		Trinidad
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1645 MHz	975 MHz
Compute units	22
Core clock speed	1448 MHz	925 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	9.26 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.63 TFLOPs
Pixel fill rate	52.6 GP/s
Stream Processors	1408
Texture fill rate	144.76 GT/s	78 GTexel / s
Transistor count	6400 million	2,800 million
Floating-point performance		2,496 gflops
Pipelines		1280
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		110 Watt
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 8-pin	1x 6-pin
Interface		PCIe 3.0 x16
Length		221 mm
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	224 GB/s	179.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	256 Bit
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory clock speed		5600 MHz
Technologies
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors		2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
API support
DirectX		12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL		4.5