AMD Radeon RX 5500M vs AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500M and AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 56% higher core clock speed: 1448 MHz vs 926 MHz
- Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1206 MHz
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 144.76 GT/s vs 137.5 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38654 vs 34588
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11058 vs 9983
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3617 vs 2443
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3345 vs 1674
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11058 vs 9983
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3617 vs 2443
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3345 vs 1674
- Around 14% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4223 vs 3699
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 vs 4 August 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1448 MHz vs 926 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz vs 1206 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 144.76 GT/s vs 137.5 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38654 vs 34588 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11058 vs 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3617 vs 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 vs 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11058 vs 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3617 vs 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 vs 1674 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4223 vs 3699 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5500M | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3166 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38654 | 34588 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11058 | 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3617 | 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 | 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11058 | 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3617 | 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 | 1674 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4223 | 3699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5500M | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | GCN 4.0 |
Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 | 4 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 390 | 482 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Code name | Ellesmere | |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $549.99 | |
Price now | $109.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 91.95 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz | 1206 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | 32 |
Core clock speed | 1448 MHz | 926 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.26 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.63 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 52.6 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 1408 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 144.76 GT/s | 137.5 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 5,700 million |
Floating-point performance | 4.9 TFLOPs | |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Laptop size | large | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 211 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
VGA | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Vulkan |