AMD Radeon RX 5500M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500M and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1448 MHz vs 1076 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1480 MHz
- Around 53% higher texture fill rate: 144.76 GT/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38186 vs 22885
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11058 vs 10251
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3345 vs 3316
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11058 vs 10251
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3345 vs 3316
- Around 43% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4223 vs 2958
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 vs 6 February 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1448 MHz vs 1076 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz vs 1480 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 144.76 GT/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38186 vs 22885 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11058 vs 10251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 vs 3316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11058 vs 10251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 vs 3316 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4223 vs 2958 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6966 vs 3166
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 632 vs 336
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3681 vs 3617
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3681 vs 3617
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6966 vs 3166 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 632 vs 336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3681 vs 3617 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3681 vs 3617 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5500M | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3166 | 6966 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 | 632 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38186 | 22885 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11058 | 10251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3617 | 3681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 | 3316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11058 | 10251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3617 | 3681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 | 3316 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4223 | 2958 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 113.416 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1414.794 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.736 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.206 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 417.823 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5500M | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Pascal |
Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 | 6 February 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 377 | 394 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Code name | GP106 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $585 | |
Price now | $429.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.44 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1448 MHz | 1076 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.26 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.63 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 52.6 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 1408 | |
Texture fill rate | 144.76 GT/s | 94.72 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 4,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops | |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin | None |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 201 mm | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 5 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 140.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Vulkan |