AMD Radeon RX 5500M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1216 MHz
  • Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 144.76 GT/s vs 144 billion / sec
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38169 vs 34898
  • Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11058 vs 9566
  • Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11058 vs 9566
  • 8.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4223 vs 475
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 Oct 2019 vs 19 September 2014
Boost clock speed 1645 MHz vs 1216 MHz
Texture fill rate 144.76 GT/s vs 144 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 38169 vs 34898
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11058 vs 9566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3345 vs 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11058 vs 9566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3345 vs 3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 4223 vs 475

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

  • 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11113 vs 3166
  • 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 vs 336
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 3617
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 3617
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 11113 vs 3166
PassMark - G2D Mark 791 vs 336
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3690 vs 3617
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3690 vs 3617

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3166
11113
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
336
791
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
38169
34898
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11058
9566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3617
3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3345
3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11058
9566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3617
3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3345
3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
4223
475
Name AMD Radeon RX 5500M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
PassMark - G3D Mark 3166 11113
PassMark - G2D Mark 336 791
Geekbench - OpenCL 38169 34898
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11058 9566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3617 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3345 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11058 9566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3617 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3345 3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 4223 475
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 110.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1348.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 9.194
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 37.443
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 477.015

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 5500M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

Essentials

Architecture RDNA Maxwell 2.0
Launch date 7 Oct 2019 19 September 2014
Place in performance rating 377 379
Type Laptop Desktop
Code name GM204
Launch price (MSRP) $549
Price now $605.06
Value for money (0-100) 21.18

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1645 MHz 1216 MHz
Compute units 22
Core clock speed 1448 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 28 nm
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 9.26 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 4.63 TFLOPs
Pixel fill rate 52.6 GP/s
Stream Processors 1408
Texture fill rate 144.76 GT/s 144 billion / sec
Transistor count 6400 million 5,200 million
CUDA cores 2048
Floating-point performance 4,981 gflops
Pipelines 2048
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 165 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Supplementary power connectors 1 x 8-pin 2x 6-pins
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 10.5" (26.7 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 500 Watt
SLI options 1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 224 GB/s 224 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 256 Bit
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory clock speed 7.0 GB/s
Shared memory 0

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
BatteryBoost
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
Surround

Video outputs and ports

Audio input for HDMI Internal
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support 1
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support
VGA аnalog display support 1

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.5