AMD Radeon RX 5500M vs AMD Radeon R9 380
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500M and AMD Radeon R9 380 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 70% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 970 MHz
- Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 144.76 GT/s vs 108.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11058 vs 7635
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11058 vs 7635
- Around 51% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4223 vs 2791
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 vs 18 June 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz vs 970 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 144.76 GT/s vs 108.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11058 vs 7635 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11058 vs 7635 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4223 vs 2791 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 380
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6081 vs 3166
- Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 653 vs 336
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 76397 vs 38172
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3617
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3617
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6081 vs 3166 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 653 vs 336 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 76397 vs 38172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3617 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3617 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3345 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 380
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5500M | AMD Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3166 | 6081 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 | 653 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38172 | 76397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11058 | 7635 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3617 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11058 | 7635 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3617 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4223 | 2791 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.135 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1503.633 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 5500M | AMD Radeon R9 380 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | GCN 3.0 |
| Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 | 18 June 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 368 | 370 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Code name | Antigua | |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Price now | $264.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 31.71 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz | 970 MHz |
| Compute units | 22 | 28 |
| Core clock speed | 1448 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.26 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.63 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 52.6 GP/s | |
| Stream Processors | 1408 | 1792 |
| Texture fill rate | 144.76 GT/s | 108.6 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 5,000 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,476 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 1792 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin | 2 x 6-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length Dual Slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 221 mm | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 182.4 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Memory clock speed | 970 MHz | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
