AMD Radeon RX 550X vs AMD Radeon HD 8690M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550X and AMD Radeon HD 8690M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 775 MHz
- Around 66% higher boost clock speed: 1287 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 3120x more texture fill rate: 51.48 GTexel/s vs 16.5 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2332 vs 984
- Around 80% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9151 vs 5079
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3428 vs 1579
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3428 vs 1579
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3139 vs 1813
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3139 vs 1813
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 3178
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 3178
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 1 March 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1287 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 51.48 GTexel/s vs 16.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2332 vs 984 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9151 vs 5079 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3428 vs 1579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3428 vs 1579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3139 vs 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3139 vs 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 3178 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 3178 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8690M
- 320x better floating-point performance: 528.0 gflops vs 1.65 TFLOPs
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 768 vs 421
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 528.0 gflops vs 1.65 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 768 vs 421 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8690M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 550X | AMD Radeon HD 8690M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 421 | 768 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2332 | 984 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9151 | 5079 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3428 | 1579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3428 | 1579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3139 | 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3139 | 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3178 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3178 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 550X | AMD Radeon HD 8690M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Lexa | Sun |
Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 1 March 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 627 | 625 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1287 MHz | 775 MHz |
Compute units | 8/10 | 6 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 775 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1.65 TFLOPs | 528.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 20.60 GP/s | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 512/640 | |
Texture fill rate | 51.48 GTexel/s | 16.5 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 40 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 32 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |