AMD Radeon RX 550X vs AMD Radeon R7 260X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550X and AMD Radeon R7 260X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1287 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 835.7x more texture fill rate: 51.48 GTexel/s vs 61.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 115 Watt
Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 8 October 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1287 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 51.48 GTexel/s vs 61.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 260X
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 896 vs 512
- 1194.5x better floating-point performance: 1,971 gflops vs 1.65 TFLOPs
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 523 vs 423
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3195 vs 2339
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3845 vs 3428
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3845 vs 3428
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3485 vs 3139
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3485 vs 3139
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 896 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops vs 1.65 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 523 vs 423 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3195 vs 2339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3845 vs 3428 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3845 vs 3428 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3485 vs 3139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3485 vs 3139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3349 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 260X
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 550X | AMD Radeon R7 260X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 | 523 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2339 | 3195 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8781 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3428 | 3845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3428 | 3845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3139 | 3485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3139 | 3485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3358 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.745 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 804.436 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.673 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.088 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 221.539 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1481 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 550X | AMD Radeon R7 260X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Lexa | Bonaire |
Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 8 October 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 633 | 636 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | |
Price now | $239 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.15 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1287 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Compute units | 8/10 | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 1.65 TFLOPs | 1,971 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 896 |
Pixel fill rate | 20.60 GP/s | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 512/640 | 896 |
Texture fill rate | 51.48 GTexel/s | 61.6 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 40 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 2,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 170 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 104 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DDMA audio |