AMD Radeon RX 550X vs AMD Radeon R7 260X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550X and AMD Radeon R7 260X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550X

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1287 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • 835.7x more texture fill rate: 51.48 GTexel/s vs 61.6 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 115 Watt
Launch date 3 April 2018 vs 8 October 2013
Boost clock speed 1287 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate 51.48 GTexel/s vs 61.6 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 115 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 260X

  • Around 75% higher pipelines: 896 vs 512
  • 1194.5x better floating-point performance: 1,971 gflops vs 1.65 TFLOPs
  • Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 523 vs 423
  • Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3195 vs 2339
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3845 vs 3428
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3845 vs 3428
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3485 vs 3139
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3485 vs 3139
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 896 vs 512
Floating-point performance 1,971 gflops vs 1.65 TFLOPs
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 523 vs 423
PassMark - G3D Mark 3195 vs 2339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3845 vs 3428
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3845 vs 3428
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3485 vs 3139
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3485 vs 3139
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 3349

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 260X

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
423
523
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2339
3195
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3428
3845
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3428
3845
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3139
3485
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3139
3485
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3349
3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3349
3358
Name AMD Radeon RX 550X AMD Radeon R7 260X
PassMark - G2D Mark 423 523
PassMark - G3D Mark 2339 3195
Geekbench - OpenCL 8781
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3428 3845
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3428 3845
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3139 3485
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3139 3485
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3349 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3349 3358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 43.745
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 804.436
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 64.088
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 221.539
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1481

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 550X AMD Radeon R7 260X

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 GCN 2.0
Code name Lexa Bonaire
Design Radeon RX 500X Series AMD Radeon R7 200 Series
GCN generation 4th Gen
Launch date 3 April 2018 8 October 2013
Place in performance rating 633 636
Type Desktop, Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $139
Price now $239
Value for money (0-100) 17.15

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1287 MHz 1000 MHz
Compute units 8/10
Core clock speed 1100 MHz
Floating-point performance 1.65 TFLOPs 1,971 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 512 896
Pixel fill rate 20.60 GP/s
Render output units 16
Stream Processors 512/640 896
Texture fill rate 51.48 GTexel/s 61.6 GTexel / s
Texture Units 40
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 115 Watt
Transistor count 2,200 million 2,080 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA
Eyefinity

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 145 mm 170 mm
Supplementary power connectors None 1 x 6-pin
Bus support PCIe 3.0

API support

DirectX 12 12
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 112 GB/s 104 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 7000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
AppAcceleration
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
AMD Eyefinity
DDMA audio