AMD Radeon RX 560 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX 560

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1090-1175 MHz vs 823 MHz
1548.4x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 52.7 GTexel / s
2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
2.1x lower typical power consumption: 60-80 Watt vs 170 Watt
4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 4008 MHz
Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6571 vs 3362
Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6571 vs 3362

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 April 2017 vs 8 March 2011
Core clock speed	1090-1175 MHz vs 823 MHz
Texture fill rate	81.60 GTexel/s vs 52.7 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1024 vs 384
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60-80 Watt vs 170 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz vs 4008 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6571 vs 3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6571 vs 3362

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM

485.9x better floating-point performance: 1,263.4 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6895 vs 3688
Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6895 vs 3688

Specifications (specs)
Floating-point performance	1,263.4 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	6895 vs 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	6895 vs 3688

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6571

3362

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3688

6895

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6571

3362

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3688

6895

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

Name	AMD Radeon RX 560	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark	3657
PassMark - G2D Mark	486
Geekbench - OpenCL	57671
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	56.81
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	775.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.602
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	64.428
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	257.062
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6571	3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3688	6895
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6571	3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3688	6895
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	3352
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1774

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 560	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name	Polaris 21	GF114
Design	Radeon RX 500 Series
GCN generation	4th Gen
Launch date	18 April 2017	8 March 2011
Launch price (MSRP)	$99
Place in performance rating	513	470
Price now	$104.99
Type	Desktop, Laptop	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	54.35
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1200-1275 MHz
Compute units	14/16
Core clock speed	1090-1175 MHz	823 MHz
Floating-point performance	2.6 TFLOPs	1,263.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	1024	384
Pixel fill rate	20.40 GP/s
Render output units	16
Stream Processors	896/1024
Texture fill rate	81.60 GTexel/s	52.7 GTexel / s
Texture Units	64
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60-80 Watt	170 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	1,950 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bridgeless CrossFire
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	170 mm	229 mm
Recommended system power (PSU)	450 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	128.3 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	4008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)