AMD Radeon RX 560 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 90% higher core clock speed: 1090-1175 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 2.1x more boost clock speed: 1200-1275 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 5913x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 13.8 GTexel / s
- 42.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 24
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 90 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 5.8x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 11.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3653 vs 306
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 488 vs 309
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 1 March 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 1090-1175 MHz vs 575 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1200-1275 MHz vs 575 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s vs 13.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 24 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 90 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3653 vs 306 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 vs 309 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
- Around 78% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 60-80 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 60-80 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 560 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3653 | 306 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 | 309 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57671 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.81 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 775.281 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.602 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.428 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 257.062 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6571 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6571 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1774 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 560 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Curie |
| Code name | Polaris 21 | G71 |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 1 March 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | $99.99 |
| Place in performance rating | 522 | 520 |
| Price now | $104.99 | $99.99 |
| Type | Desktop, Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 54.35 | 3.97 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200-1275 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Compute units | 14/16 | |
| Core clock speed | 1090-1175 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2.6 TFLOPs | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 90 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 24 |
| Pixel fill rate | 20.40 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 16 | |
| Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
| Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s | 13.8 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 64 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60-80 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 278 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-III |
| Length | 170 mm | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 9.0c |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 38.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 700 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | 256 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 560 with others
AMDRadeon RX 560 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3500M
AMDRadeon RX 560 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7950
AMDRadeon RX 560 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770
AMDRadeon RX 560 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960
AMDRadeon RX 560 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000
AMDRadeon RX 560 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
