AMD Radeon RX 5600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX 5600

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600

Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1130 MHz vs 885 MHz
Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1185 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 683 vs 483
Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11959 vs 11748
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 19735 vs 8055
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 19735 vs 8055

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	21 Jan 2020 vs 29 January 2019
Core clock speed	1130 MHz vs 885 MHz
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz vs 1185 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 12 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	683 vs 483
PassMark - G3D Mark	11959 vs 11748
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	19735 vs 8055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	19735 vs 8055

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 150 Watt
9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 78123 vs 60737
Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17328 vs 14115
Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17328 vs 14115
Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 7991
Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 7991

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2304 vs 2048
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	115 Watt vs 150 Watt
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	78123 vs 60737
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	17328 vs 14115
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	17328 vs 14115
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8912 vs 7991
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8912 vs 7991

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

60737

78123

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

683

483

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

11959

11748

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14115

17328

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14115

17328

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7991

8912

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7991

8912

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19735

8055

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19735

8055

Name	AMD Radeon RX 5600	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Geekbench - OpenCL	60737	78123
PassMark - G2D Mark	683	483
PassMark - G3D Mark	11959	11748
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14115	17328
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14115	17328
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	7991	8912
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	7991	8912
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	19735	8055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	19735	8055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		168.08
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1935.102
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		22.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		111.023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		1001.496
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		6841

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 5600	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Turing
Code name	Navi 10	TU106
Launch date	21 Jan 2020	29 January 2019
Place in performance rating	125	178
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz	1185 MHz
Compute units	32
Core clock speed	1130 MHz	885 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	399.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	12.78 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	6.390 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2048	2304
Pixel fill rate	99.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	199.7 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	150 Watt	115 Watt
Transistor count	10300 million	10,800 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Recommended system power (PSU)	350 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
Width	Dual-slot
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s
Memory bus width	192 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)	14000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6