AMD Radeon RX 5600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 683 vs 601
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 19735 vs 8029
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 19735 vs 8029
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 vs 29 January 2019 |
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 683 vs 601 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 19735 vs 8029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 19735 vs 8029 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1130 MHz
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12354 vs 11959
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18604 vs 14115
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18604 vs 14115
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8898 vs 7991
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8898 vs 7991
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 1130 MHz |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 2048 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12354 vs 11959 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18604 vs 14115 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18604 vs 14115 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8898 vs 7991 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8898 vs 7991 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 60737 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 683 | 601 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11959 | 12354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14115 | 18604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14115 | 18604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7991 | 8898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7991 | 8898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 19735 | 8029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 19735 | 8029 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7453 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 10 | TU106 |
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 | 29 January 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 125 | 128 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Price now | $489.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.06 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 1130 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 399.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.78 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.390 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 199.7 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |