AMD Radeon RX 560D vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560D and NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 74% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 6.6x more texture fill rate: 65.8 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
- 18.7x more pipelines: 896 vs 48
- 16.1x better floating-point performance: 2,106 gflops vs 130.56 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 9x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 666 MHz
Launch date | 4 July 2017 vs 3 September 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 65.8 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 2,106 gflops vs 130.56 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 666 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 65 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560D
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM
Name | AMD Radeon RX 560D | NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 249 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 251 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 560D | NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | GT216 |
Launch date | 4 July 2017 | 3 September 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | |
Place in performance rating | 703 | 702 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1175 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 625 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,106 gflops | 130.56 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 65.8 GTexel / s | 10 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 32 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 486 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 170 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 10.66 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 666 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |