AMD Radeon RX 560D vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560D and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1175 MHz vs 980 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 1000x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 3684
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 3684
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 July 2017 vs 16 August 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 915 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1175 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 vs 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 vs 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 3337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 3337 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 65.8 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 896
- Around 17% better floating-point performance: 2,459.5 gflops vs 2,106 gflops
| Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec vs 65.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 896 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops vs 2,106 gflops |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560D
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 560D | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3337 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4407 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 461 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15191 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.256 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.001 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.191 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3285 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3285 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1616 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 560D | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Polaris 21 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 4 July 2017 | 16 August 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | $299 |
| Place in performance rating | 733 | 736 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $321.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.34 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1175 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,106 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1344 |
| Texture fill rate | 65.8 GTexel / s | 102.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 170 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 560D with others
AMDRadeon RX 560D vs
ATIMobility FireGL V3200
AMDRadeon RX 560D vs
ATIFireGL V3200
AMDRadeon RX 560D vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3450
AMDRadeon RX 560D vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 Ti
AMDRadeon RX 560D vs
NVIDIAGeForce 830A
AMDRadeon RX 560D vs
AMDRadeon E8950
