AMD Radeon RX 560D vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560D and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560D

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 915 MHz
  • Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1175 MHz vs 980 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 150 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • 1000x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 3684
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 3684
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 4 July 2017 vs 16 August 2012
Core clock speed 1090 MHz vs 915 MHz
Boost clock speed 1175 MHz vs 980 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt vs 150 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3705 vs 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3705 vs 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3350 vs 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3350 vs 3337

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

  • Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 65.8 GTexel / s
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 896
  • Around 17% better floating-point performance: 2,459.5 gflops vs 2,106 gflops
Texture fill rate 102.5 billion / sec vs 65.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1344 vs 896
Floating-point performance 2,459.5 gflops vs 2,106 gflops

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560D
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3705
3684
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3705
3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3350
3337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3350
3337
Name AMD Radeon RX 560D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3705 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3705 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3350 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3350 3337
PassMark - G3D Mark 4422
PassMark - G2D Mark 465
Geekbench - OpenCL 15315
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 36.256
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1029.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.037
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 45.894
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 82.191
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3285
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1616

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 560D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Kepler
Code name Polaris 21 GK104
Launch date 4 July 2017 16 August 2012
Launch price (MSRP) $99 $299
Place in performance rating 742 745
Type Desktop Desktop
Price now $321.99
Value for money (0-100) 17.34

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1175 MHz 980 MHz
Core clock speed 1090 MHz 915 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,106 gflops 2,459.5 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 896 1344
Texture fill rate 65.8 GTexel / s 102.5 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 150 Watt
Transistor count 3,000 million 3,540 million
CUDA cores 1344

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Audio input for HDMI Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 170 mm 9.5" (24.1 cm)
Supplementary power connectors None Two 6-pin
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options 3-way

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 96 GB / s 144.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 192-bit GDDR5
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz 6.0 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA