AMD Radeon RX 560D vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560D and NVIDIA Quadro M2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 1029 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1175 MHz vs 1098 MHz
- Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 65.8 GTexel / s vs 43.92 GTexel / s
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 896 vs 640
- Around 50% better floating-point performance: 2,106 gflops vs 1,405 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
| Launch date | 4 July 2017 vs 3 December 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 1029 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1175 MHz vs 1098 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 65.8 GTexel / s vs 43.92 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 896 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,106 gflops vs 1,405 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 65 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560D
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 560D | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3355 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3446 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8148 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.281 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 782.113 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.5 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.048 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 172.896 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4920 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4920 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 560D | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Polaris 21 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 4 July 2017 | 3 December 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | |
| Place in performance rating | 703 | 700 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1175 MHz | 1098 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,106 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 65.8 GTexel / s | 43.92 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Length | 170 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 80 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||