AMD Radeon RX 570X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 570X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 570X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 94 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1168 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1244 MHz vs 980 MHz
- 1450.2x more texture fill rate: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 109.8 GTexel / s
- Around 52% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1344
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 42% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8697 vs 8276
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8697 vs 8276
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 750 vs 694
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 April 2108 vs 25 August 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1168 MHz vs 915 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1244 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s vs 109.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 1344 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 170 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8697 vs 8276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8697 vs 8276 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 vs 694 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
- 516.5x better floating-point performance: 2,634 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3627 vs 3101
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3627 vs 3101
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5427 vs 1923
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,634 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3627 vs 3101 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3627 vs 3101 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3345 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5427 vs 1923 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 570X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8697 | 8276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8697 | 8276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3101 | 3627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3101 | 3627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 | 3354 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 | 694 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1923 | 5427 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38939 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 570X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Polaris 20 | GK104 |
| Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch date | 3 April 2108 | 25 August 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 337 | 306 |
| Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1244 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Compute units | 32 | |
| Core clock speed | 1168 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 5.1 TFLOPs | 2,634 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1344 |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.81 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s | 109.8 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 128 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 241 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 192.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 570X with others
AMDRadeon RX 570X vs
ATIRadeon HD 4810
AMDRadeon RX 570X vs
AMDFirePro W9000
AMDRadeon RX 570X vs
AMDRadeon RX 480
AMDRadeon RX 570X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
AMDRadeon RX 570X vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 570X vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP
