AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP and NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1168 MHz vs 738 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 6.9x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1008 MHz
- 46.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7657 vs 166
- 13.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 vs 51
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1890.261 vs 1813.265
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.008 vs 38.948
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 3689
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 1731
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 3689
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 1731
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 October 2018 vs 10 March 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1168 MHz vs 738 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7657 vs 166 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 vs 51 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 vs 1813.265 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.008 vs 38.948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 vs 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 1731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 vs 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 1731 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 179.899 vs 122.268
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.817 vs 10.121
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 757.451 vs 625.621
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 179.899 vs 122.268 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.817 vs 10.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 757.451 vs 625.621 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7657 | 166 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 | 51 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34598 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 122.268 | 179.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 | 1813.265 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 | 13.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.008 | 38.948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 625.621 | 757.451 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 1731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 1731 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 849 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Polaris 20 | G96C |
Launch date | 15 October 2018 | 10 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 358 | 606 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1284 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1168 MHz | 738 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 314 million |
Floating-point performance | 117.5 gflops | |
Pipelines | 32 | |
Texture fill rate | 11.81 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1008 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 16.13 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR2 |