AMD Radeon RX 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 78% higher core clock speed: 1257 MHz vs 705 MHz
• Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 1340 MHz vs 876 MHz
• 570.9x more texture fill rate: 192.96 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 185 Watt vs 375 Watt
• 1142.9x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 767 vs 639
• Around 72% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39028 vs 22732
• Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 116.142 vs 66.419
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.235 vs 7.89
• 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 84.034 vs 17.882
• Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 vs 309.857
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11281 vs 8124
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 vs 2413
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 2226
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11281 vs 8124
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 vs 2413
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 2226

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

• 2.5x more pipelines: 2x 2880 vs 2304
• 1627.7x better floating-point performance: 2x 5,046 gflops vs 6.2 TFLOPs
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8905 vs 8827
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1261.593 vs 1022.932
• 17x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17055 vs 1005

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8827 8905
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	767 639
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39028 22732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	116.142 66.419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1022.932 1261.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.235 7.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	84.034 17.882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	607.721 309.857
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11281 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3695 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 2226
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11281 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3695 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 2226
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1005 17055

Compare specifications (specs)