AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 GME and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
  • Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 157.1 GTexel/s
  • Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
  • Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6839 vs 3717
  • Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6839 vs 3717
  • 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 20161 vs 3351
  • 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 20161 vs 3351
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 9 Mar 2020 vs 29 Oct 2019
Texture fill rate 198.7 GTexel/s vs 157.1 GTexel/s
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 6 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 6839 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 6839 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 20161 vs 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 20161 vs 3351

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

  • Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1257 MHz
  • Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1380 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 175 Watt
  • Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 805 vs 671
  • Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12726 vs 8625
  • 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 vs 5140
  • 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 vs 5140
  • Around 35% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5993 vs 4428
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1530 MHz vs 1257 MHz
Boost clock speed 1785 MHz vs 1380 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 125 Watt vs 175 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 805 vs 671
PassMark - G3D Mark 12726 vs 8625
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 17812 vs 5140
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 17812 vs 5140
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 5993 vs 4428

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
671
805
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
8625
12726
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5140
17812
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5140
17812
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6839
3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6839
3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20161
3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20161
3351
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
4428
5993
Name AMD Radeon RX 590 GME NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
PassMark - G2D Mark 671 805
PassMark - G3D Mark 8625 12726
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5140 17812
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5140 17812
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 6839 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 6839 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 20161 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 20161 3351
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 4428 5993
Geekbench - OpenCL 62606
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 187.131
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2548.187
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 15.882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 117.673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 901.388

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 590 GME NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Turing
Code name Polaris 20 TU116
Design Radeon RX 500 Series
Launch date 9 Mar 2020 29 Oct 2019
Place in performance rating 214 213
Type Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $229

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1380 MHz 1785 MHz
Compute units 36
Core clock speed 1257 MHz 1530 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 397.4 GFLOPS (1:16) 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 6.359 TFLOPS (1:1) 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 6.359 TFLOPS 5.027 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate 44.16 GPixel/s 85.68 GPixel/s
Render output units 32
Stream Processors 2304
Texture fill rate 198.7 GTexel/s 157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Units 144
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 175 Watt 125 Watt
Transistor count 5700 million 6600 million
Pipelines 1408

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 241 mm (9.5 inches) 9 inches (229 mm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 450 Watt 350 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin 1x 8-pin
Width Dual-slot Dual-slot

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.1
OpenCL 2.0 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 256 GB/s 336.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit 192 bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective)
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR6

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support