AMD Ryzen 9 9900X 12-Core Processor vs AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 9 9900X 12-Core Processor and AMD Radeon RX 590 GME videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 687 vs 599
- 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8457 vs 1729
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 687 vs 599 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8457 vs 1729 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X 12-Core Processor
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Ryzen 9 9900X 12-Core Processor | AMD Radeon RX 590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 599 | 687 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1729 | 8457 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5140 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5140 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6839 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6839 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20161 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20161 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1001 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Ryzen 9 9900X 12-Core Processor | AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Place in performance rating | 226 | 228 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | |
| Code name | Polaris 20 | |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| Launch date | 9 Mar 2020 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1257 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 397.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.16 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 5700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||

