AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT and AMD Radeon Pro Vega II videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1968 MHz vs 1574 MHz
- Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 2589 MHz vs 1720 MHz
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 475 Watt
- Around 24% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1612 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16510 vs 15597
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 913 vs 748
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3728 vs 3100
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3367 vs 2813
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3728 vs 3100
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3367 vs 2813
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 Jul 2021 vs Dec 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1968 MHz vs 1574 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2589 MHz vs 1720 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 475 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1612 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16510 vs 15597 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 913 vs 748 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3728 vs 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 vs 2813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3728 vs 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 vs 2813 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
- Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 440.3 GTexel/s vs 331.4 GTexel/s
- 2x more pipelines: 4096 vs 2048
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99539 vs 82391
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16149 vs 15486
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16149 vs 15486
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s vs 331.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2048 |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99539 vs 82391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16149 vs 15486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16149 vs 15486 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16510 | 15597 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 913 | 748 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82391 | 99539 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 706.665 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15486 | 16149 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3728 | 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 | 2813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15486 | 16149 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3728 | 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 | 2813 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9583 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 5.1 |
Code name | Navi 23 XT | Vega 20 |
Launch date | 30 Jul 2021 | Dec 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | |
Place in performance rating | 174 | 172 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2589 MHz | 1720 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | 64 |
Core clock speed | 1968 MHz | 1574 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 662.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.21 TFLOPS (2:1) | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.60 TFLOPS | 14.09 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2048 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.7 GPixel/s | 110.1 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 331.4 GTexel/s | 440.3 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 475 Watt |
Transistor count | 11060 million | 13230 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | 850 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | Dual-slot |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 32 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 825.3 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 4096 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1612 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |