AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT and NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
- Around 82% higher core clock speed: 1968 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- Around 66% higher boost clock speed: 2589 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 66% higher texture fill rate: 331.4 GTexel/s vs 199.7 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16512 vs 12481
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 913 vs 512
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82372 vs 78584
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1968 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2589 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 331.4 GTexel/s vs 199.7 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16512 vs 12481 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 913 vs 512 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82372 vs 78584 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3728 vs 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3728 vs 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
- 2x more pipelines: 4096 vs 2048
- Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 160 Watt
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20429 vs 15486
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20429 vs 15486
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2048 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20429 vs 15486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20429 vs 15486 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16512 | 12481 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 913 | 512 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82372 | 78584 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 706.665 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15486 | 20429 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3728 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15486 | 20429 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3728 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9583 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 23 XT | GA104 |
Launch date | 30 Jul 2021 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | |
Place in performance rating | 174 | 176 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2589 MHz | 1560 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 1968 MHz | 1080 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 662.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 199.7 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.21 TFLOPS (2:1) | 12.78 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.60 TFLOPS | 12.78 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2048 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.7 GPixel/s | 99.84 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 331.4 GTexel/s | 199.7 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 130 Watt |
Transistor count | 11060 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |