AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
  • Around 96% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 930 MHz
  • 2.1x more boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1080 MHz
  • 3.8x more texture fill rate: 648.0 GTexel/s vs 172.8 GTexel/s
  • Around 80% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 2560
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 45% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
  • Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25004 vs 13637
  • Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1025 vs 612
  • Around 92% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 154220 vs 80223
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 28 Oct 2020 vs 2 Apr 2020
Core clock speed 1825 MHz vs 930 MHz
Boost clock speed 2250 MHz vs 1080 MHz
Texture fill rate 648.0 GTexel/s vs 172.8 GTexel/s
Pipelines 4608 vs 2560
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 12 nm
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 8 GB
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 25004 vs 13637
PassMark - G2D Mark 1025 vs 612
Geekbench - OpenCL 154220 vs 80223

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

  • 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 80 W vs 300 Watt
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20002 vs 16849
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 10384 vs 3720
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10130 vs 3374
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20002 vs 16849
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 10384 vs 3720
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10130 vs 3374
  • 2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7412 vs 3689
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 W vs 300 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20002 vs 16849
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 10384 vs 3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 10130 vs 3374
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20002 vs 16849
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 10384 vs 3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 10130 vs 3374
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7412 vs 3689

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
25004
13637
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1025
612
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
154220
80223
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16849
20002
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3720
10384
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3374
10130
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16849
20002
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3720
10384
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3374
10130
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
3689
7412
Name AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark 25004 13637
PassMark - G2D Mark 1025 612
Geekbench - OpenCL 154220 80223
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 578.52
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 52.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 291.971
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2700.97
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16849 20002
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3720 10384
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3374 10130
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16849 20002
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3720 10384
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3374 10130
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3689 7412

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 2.0 Turing
Code name Navi 21 TU104B
Launch date 28 Oct 2020 2 Apr 2020
Launch price (MSRP) $649
Place in performance rating 71 107
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 2250 MHz 1080 MHz
Compute units 72
Core clock speed 1825 MHz 930 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 1296 GFLOPS (1:16) 172.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 41.47 TFLOPS (2:1) 11.06 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 20.74 TFLOPS 5.530 TFLOPS
Pipelines 4608 2560
Pixel fill rate 288.0 GPixel/s 69.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 648.0 GTexel/s 172.8 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 300 Watt 80 W
Transistor count 26800 million 13600 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Height 50 mm (2 inches)
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm (10.5 inches)
Recommended system power (PSU) 700 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin None
Width 120 mm (4.7 inches) IGP

API support

DirectX 12.2 12.1
OpenCL 2.1 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 512.0 GB/s 352.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6