NVIDIA RTX A5000 vs AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A5000 and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 8192 vs 4608
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 16 GB
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1032 vs 1025
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 581.432 vs 578.52
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 54.372 vs 52.561
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22508 vs 16849
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22508 vs 16849
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 vs 28 Oct 2020 |
| Pipelines | 8192 vs 4608 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 16 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1032 vs 1025 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 154729 vs 154220 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 vs 578.52 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 vs 52.561 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 vs 16849 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 vs 16849 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
- Around 56% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1170 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Around 49% higher texture fill rate: 648.0 GTexel/s vs 433.9 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25004 vs 22553
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 291.971 vs 191.518
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2700.97 vs 2038.811
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3374 vs 3355
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3374 vs 3355
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1170 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 648.0 GTexel/s vs 433.9 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 25004 vs 22553 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 291.971 vs 191.518 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2700.97 vs 2038.811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3374 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3374 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22553 | 25004 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1032 | 1025 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 154729 | 154220 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 | 578.52 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 | 52.561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 | 291.971 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 | 2700.97 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 | 16849 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3374 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 | 16849 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3374 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3689 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A5000 | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Code name | GA102 | Navi 21 |
| Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | 28 Oct 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 69 | 71 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1170 MHz | 1825 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 867.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | 1296 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | 41.47 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS | 20.74 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 8192 | 4608 |
| Pixel fill rate | 162.7 GPixel/s | 288.0 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 433.9 GTexel/s | 648.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Transistor count | 28300 million | 26800 million |
| Compute units | 72 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 700 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) |
| Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 768 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 384 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |