AMD Radeon RX 6800M vs NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800M and NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 15 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 3.8x more core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 610 MHz
- 8463.1x more texture fill rate: 413.0 GTexel/s vs 48.8 GTexel / s
- 10.7x more pipelines: 2560 vs 240
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 55 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1600 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13316 vs 12650
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 9 April 2009 |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 610 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s vs 48.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 240 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13316 vs 12650 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 188 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 595 vs 544
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 188 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 595 vs 544 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6800M | NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13316 | 12650 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 544 | 595 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17137 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18453 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 16764 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17137 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18453 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 16764 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2244 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6800M | NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 22 | GT200B |
Launch date | 2021 | 9 April 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 83 | 81 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz | |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz | 610 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 55 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 240 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s | 48.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 188 Watt |
Transistor count | 17200 million | 1,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 102.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |