AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1140 MHz
- Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 2544 MHz vs 1605 MHz
- 4.3x more texture fill rate: 549.5 GTexel/s vs 128.4 GTexel/s
- Around 35% higher pipelines: 3456 vs 2560
- 2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1140 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2544 MHz vs 1605 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 549.5 GTexel/s vs 128.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3456 vs 2560 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 5 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 245 Watt
Launch date | 2023 vs 25 Aug 2023 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 5 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 245 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q
Name | AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1150 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22445 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 127132 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3316 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | Navi 32 | AD107 |
Launch date | 25 Aug 2023 | 2023 |
Place in performance rating | 53 | not rated |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2544 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Compute units | 54 | |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1140 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 4 nm |
Pipelines | 3456 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 244.2 GPixel/s | 51.36 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 549.5 GTexel/s | 128.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 245 Watt | 85 Watt |
Transistor count | 28100 million | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 128.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.218 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.218 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | IGP |
Height | 50 mm, 2 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
Width | 135 mm, 5.3 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.2 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 168.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 96 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |