AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT vs AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 549.5 GTexel/s vs 413.0 GTexel/s
- Around 35% higher pipelines: 3456 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 7 nm
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1128 vs 943
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22459 vs 19834
- Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 126914 vs 100202
- Around 36% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3312 vs 2438
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 Aug 2023 vs 3 Mar 2021 |
Texture fill rate | 549.5 GTexel/s vs 413.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3456 vs 2560 |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 7 nm |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1128 vs 943 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22459 vs 19834 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 126914 vs 100202 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3312 vs 2438 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1700 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 2544 MHz
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 245 Watt
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1700 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz vs 2544 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 245 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1128 | 943 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22459 | 19834 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 126914 | 100202 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3312 | 2438 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 349.422 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.064 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15315 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15315 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 32 | Navi 22 |
Launch date | 25 Aug 2023 | 3 Mar 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 49 | 50 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $479 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2544 MHz | 2581 MHz |
Compute units | 54 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz | 2321 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 7 nm |
Pipelines | 3456 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 244.2 GPixel/s | 165.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 549.5 GTexel/s | 413.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 245 Watt | 230 Watt |
Transistor count | 28100 million | 17200 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 50 mm, 2 inches | 40 mm (1.6 inches) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 550 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | 135 mm, 5.3 inches | 110 mm (4.3 inches) |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |