AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT vs Intel Arc A770
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT and Intel Arc A770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 2430 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 6 nm
- Around 22% higher memory clock speed: 2438 MHz, 19.5 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1169 vs 753
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 24198 vs 13175
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 140136 vs 108639
- Around 40% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4157 vs 2969
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.482 vs 36.277
- 27.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 530.303 vs 19.001
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2259.753 vs 1958.986
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 Aug 2023 vs 12 Oct 2022 |
Boost clock speed | 2430 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 6 nm |
Memory clock speed | 2438 MHz, 19.5 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1169 vs 753 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 24198 vs 13175 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 140136 vs 108639 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4157 vs 2969 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.482 vs 36.277 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 530.303 vs 19.001 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2259.753 vs 1958.986 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A770
- Around 62% higher core clock speed: 2100 MHz vs 1295 MHz
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 614.4 GTexel/s vs 583.2 GTexel/s
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3840
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 263 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 552.246 vs 500.918
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 2100 MHz vs 1295 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 614.4 GTexel/s vs 583.2 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 3840 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 263 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 552.246 vs 500.918 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
GPU 2: Intel Arc A770
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT | Intel Arc A770 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1169 | 753 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 24198 | 13175 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 140136 | 108639 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4157 | 2969 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 500.918 | 552.246 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.482 | 36.277 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 530.303 | 19.001 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2259.753 | 1958.986 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4822.738 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT | Intel Arc A770 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Generation 12.7 |
Code name | Navi 32 | DG2-512 |
Launch date | 25 Aug 2023 | 12 Oct 2022 |
Place in performance rating | 24 | 98 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2430 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Compute units | 60 | |
Core clock speed | 1295 MHz | 2100 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 6 nm |
Pipelines | 3840 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 233.3 GPixel/s | 307.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 583.2 GTexel/s | 614.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 263 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 28100 million | 21700 million |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 39.32 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.66 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Height | 50 mm, 2 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | 550 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.2 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 624.1 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2438 MHz, 19.5 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |