NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
Around 81% higher core clock speed: 2340 MHz vs 1295 MHz
Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 2610 MHz vs 2430 MHz
Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 689.0 GTexel/s vs 583.2 GTexel/s
2.2x more pipelines: 8448 vs 3840
Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1187 vs 1121
Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 31699 vs 24184
Around 60% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 224450 vs 140260
Around 21% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 24253 vs 20031
Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 61.731 vs 43.482
Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3080.809 vs 2259.753

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	8 Jan 2024 vs 25 Aug 2023
Core clock speed	2340 MHz vs 1295 MHz
Boost clock speed	2610 MHz vs 2430 MHz
Texture fill rate	689.0 GTexel/s vs 583.2 GTexel/s
Pipelines	8448 vs 3840
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	1187 vs 1121
PassMark - G3D Mark	31699 vs 24184
Geekbench - OpenCL	224450 vs 140260
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	24253 vs 20031
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	61.731 vs 43.482
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	3080.809 vs 2259.753

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 263 Watt vs 285 Watt
Around 86% higher memory clock speed: 2438 MHz, 19.5 Gbps effective vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective
Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 500.918 vs 363.635
4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 530.303 vs 116.521

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	263 Watt vs 285 Watt
Memory clock speed	2438 MHz, 19.5 Gbps effective vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	500.918 vs 363.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	530.303 vs 116.521

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1187

1121

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

31699

24184

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

224450

140260

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

24253

20031

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

363.635

500.918

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

61.731

43.482

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

116.521

530.303

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3080.809

2259.753

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER	AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
PassMark - G2D Mark	1187	1121
PassMark - G3D Mark	31699	24184
Geekbench - OpenCL	224450	140260
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	24253	20031
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	363.635	500.918
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	61.731	43.482
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	116.521	530.303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	3080.809	2259.753

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER	AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Essentials
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.0
Code name	AD103	Navi 32
Launch date	8 Jan 2024	25 Aug 2023
Place in performance rating	25	26
Technical info
Boost clock speed	2610 MHz	2430 MHz
Core clock speed	2340 MHz	1295 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	5 nm
Pipelines	8448	3840
Pixel fill rate	250.6 GPixel/s	233.3 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	689.0 GTexel/s	583.2 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	285 Watt	263 Watt
Transistor count	45900 million	28100 million
Compute units		60
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	Triple-slot	Dual-slot
Height	61 mm, 2.4 inches	50 mm, 2 inches
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	310 mm, 12.2 inches	267 mm, 10.5 inches
Recommended system power (PSU)	600 Watt	600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	2x 8-pin
Width	140 mm, 5.5 inches	111 mm, 4.4 inches
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	16 GB
Memory bandwidth	672.3 GB/s	624.1 GB/s
Memory bus width	256 bit	256 bit
Memory clock speed	1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective	2438 MHz, 19.5 Gbps effective
Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR6