NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 81% higher core clock speed: 2340 MHz vs 1295 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 2610 MHz vs 2430 MHz
- Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 689.0 GTexel/s vs 583.2 GTexel/s
- 2.2x more pipelines: 8448 vs 3840
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1190 vs 1132
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 31732 vs 24329
- Around 60% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 224018 vs 140243
- Around 21% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 24245 vs 20048
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 61.731 vs 43.482
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3080.809 vs 2259.753
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 Jan 2024 vs 25 Aug 2023 |
| Core clock speed | 2340 MHz vs 1295 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2610 MHz vs 2430 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 689.0 GTexel/s vs 583.2 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 8448 vs 3840 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1190 vs 1132 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 31732 vs 24329 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 224018 vs 140243 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 24245 vs 20048 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 61.731 vs 43.482 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3080.809 vs 2259.753 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
- Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 263 Watt vs 285 Watt
- Around 86% higher memory clock speed: 2438 MHz, 19.5 Gbps effective vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 500.918 vs 363.635
- 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 530.303 vs 116.521
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 263 Watt vs 285 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2438 MHz, 19.5 Gbps effective vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 500.918 vs 363.635 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 530.303 vs 116.521 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1190 | 1132 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 31732 | 24329 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 224018 | 140243 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 24245 | 20048 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 363.635 | 500.918 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 61.731 | 43.482 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.521 | 530.303 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3080.809 | 2259.753 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Code name | AD103 | Navi 32 |
| Launch date | 8 Jan 2024 | 25 Aug 2023 |
| Place in performance rating | 24 | 25 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2610 MHz | 2430 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2340 MHz | 1295 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Pipelines | 8448 | 3840 |
| Pixel fill rate | 250.6 GPixel/s | 233.3 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 689.0 GTexel/s | 583.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 285 Watt | 263 Watt |
| Transistor count | 45900 million | 28100 million |
| Compute units | 60 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Triple-slot | Dual-slot |
| Height | 61 mm, 2.4 inches | 50 mm, 2 inches |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 310 mm, 12.2 inches | 267 mm, 10.5 inches |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | 600 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | 140 mm, 5.5 inches | 111 mm, 4.4 inches |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 672.3 GB/s | 624.1 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective | 2438 MHz, 19.5 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs
NVIDIATITAN V CEO Edition
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX 7800 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs
NVIDIAA800 PCIe 80 GB
