AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile vs ATI Radeon X800 PRO
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile and ATI Radeon X800 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 9.1x more texture fill rate: 52 GTexel / s vs 5.7 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 130 nm
- 4.8x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 48 Watt
- 25.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1632 vs 65
- Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 374 vs 190
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 October 2017 vs 1 May 2004 |
Texture fill rate | 52 GTexel / s vs 5.7 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 130 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 48 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1632 vs 65 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 vs 190 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X800 PRO
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 475 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 475 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X800 PRO
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile | ATI Radeon X800 PRO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1632 | 65 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 | 190 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10265 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.977 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 309.874 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.177 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.847 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 167.399 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2315 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3162 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2315 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3162 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile | ATI Radeon X800 PRO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | R400 |
Code name | Raven | R423 |
Launch date | 26 October 2017 | 1 May 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 925 | 923 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 475 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,664 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | |
Texture fill rate | 52 GTexel / s | 5.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 48 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 160 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR3 |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz |