AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 4.5x more texture fill rate: 57.2 GTexel / s vs 12.72 GTexel / s
- 14.7x more pipelines: 704 vs 48
- 14.4x better floating-point performance: 1,830 gflops vs 127.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 71% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 60 Watt
Launch date | 15 May 2018 vs 29 July 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 57.2 GTexel / s vs 12.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 704 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 1,830 gflops vs 127.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS
- Around 77% higher core clock speed: 530 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
Core clock speed | 530 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1162 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 278 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 38 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3297 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3297 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Raven | G94 |
Launch date | 15 May 2018 | 29 July 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1457 | 1454 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 530 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,830 gflops | 127.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 704 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 57.2 GTexel / s | 12.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 505 million |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Gigaflops | 180 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR3 |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
PureVideo HD |