AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 vs AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1240 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 55 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- Around 83% higher pipelines: 704 vs 384
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 1,760 gflops vs 806.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 85% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14572 vs 7892
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3455 vs 2097
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3455 vs 2097
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 5 May 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1240 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 55 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 704 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,760 gflops vs 806.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14572 vs 7892 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3455 vs 2097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3455 vs 2097 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3127 vs 1857
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6862 vs 3107
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3127 vs 1857
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6862 vs 3107
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3127 vs 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6862 vs 3107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3127 vs 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6862 vs 3107 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2116 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 524 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14572 | 7892 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.991 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.578 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.196 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 262.35 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3455 | 2097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1857 | 3127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 | 6862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3455 | 2097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1857 | 3127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 | 6862 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1201 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Raven | Oland |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 830 | 832 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1240 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,760 gflops | 806.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 704 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 55 GTexel / s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 0 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 |