AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1240 MHz vs 1219 MHz
• Around 41% higher texture fill rate: 55 GTexel / s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
• Around 38% higher pipelines: 704 vs 512
• Around 41% better floating-point performance: 1,760 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2111 vs 1843
• Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 522 vs 390
• Around 42% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14582 vs 10245
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.991 vs 30.848
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.196 vs 2.268
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.784 vs 46.988
• Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 262.35 vs 139.235
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3455 vs 3241
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3455 vs 3241

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

• 3.1x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 438.581 vs 364.578
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 1857
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3107
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 1857
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3107

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2111 1843
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	522 390
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	14582 10245
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.991 30.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	364.578 438.581
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.196 2.268
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.784 46.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	262.35 139.235
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3455 3241
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1857 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3107 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3455 3241
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1857 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3107 3350

Compare specifications (specs)