AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1156 MHz vs 900 MHz
  • Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 1471 MHz vs 925 MHz
  • 5574.3x more texture fill rate: 330.00 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
  • 3.5x more pipelines: 3584 vs 1024
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
  • 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 163998 vs 70535
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14462 vs 6316
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14462 vs 6316
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 14 August 2017 vs 13 March 2015
Core clock speed 1156 MHz vs 900 MHz
Boost clock speed 1471 MHz vs 925 MHz
Texture fill rate 330.00 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 3584 vs 1024
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 163998 vs 70535
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 14462 vs 6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 14462 vs 6316

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

  • 180.4x better floating-point performance: 1,894 gflops vs 10.5 TFLOPs
  • Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 210 Watt
  • 3x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 3717
  • 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 3361
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 3717
  • 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 3361
Specifications (specs)
Floating-point performance 1,894 gflops vs 10.5 TFLOPs
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt vs 210 Watt
Memory clock speed 4800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8390 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 27566 vs 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8390 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 27566 vs 3361

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
163998
70535
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14462
6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3361
27566
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14462
6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3361
27566
Name AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
PassMark - G3D Mark 13295
PassMark - G2D Mark 774
Geekbench - OpenCL 163998 70535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 184.405
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1765.06
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 12.606
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 79.32
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1022.925
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 14462 6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3361 27566
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 14462 6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3361 27566
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 6875

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Vega 10 Pitcairn
Design Radeon RX Vega Series
Launch date 14 August 2017 13 March 2015
Launch price (MSRP) $399
Place in performance rating 211 165
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1471 MHz 925 MHz
Compute units 56
Core clock speed 1156 MHz 900 MHz
Floating-point performance 10.5 TFLOPs 1,894 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 21 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 10.5 TFLOPs
Pipelines 3584 1024
Pixel fill rate 94.00 GP/s
Render output units 64
Stream Processors 3584
Texture fill rate 330.00 GTexel/s 59.2 GTexel / s
Texture Units 256
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 210 Watt 150 Watt
Transistor count 12,500 million 2,800 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Recommended system power (PSU) 650 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 410 GB/s 153.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 2048 bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz 4800 MHz
Memory type HBM2 GDDR5

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
FreeSync
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
VR Ready
ZeroCore