AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1156 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 1471 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 5574.3x more texture fill rate: 330.00 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 3.5x more pipelines: 3584 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 163998 vs 70535
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14462 vs 6316
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14462 vs 6316
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 August 2017 vs 13 March 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1156 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1471 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 330.00 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 1024 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 163998 vs 70535 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14462 vs 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14462 vs 6316 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
- 180.4x better floating-point performance: 1,894 gflops vs 10.5 TFLOPs
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 210 Watt
- 3x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 3717
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 3361
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 3717
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 3361
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops vs 10.5 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 210 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8390 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 27566 vs 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8390 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 27566 vs 3361 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13295 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 774 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 163998 | 70535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 184.405 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1765.06 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.606 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.32 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1022.925 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14462 | 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 8390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 27566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14462 | 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 8390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 27566 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6875 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Vega 10 | Pitcairn |
Design | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Launch date | 14 August 2017 | 13 March 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Place in performance rating | 211 | 165 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1471 MHz | 925 MHz |
Compute units | 56 | |
Core clock speed | 1156 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 10.5 TFLOPs | 1,894 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.5 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 3584 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 94.00 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 3584 | |
Texture fill rate | 330.00 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 256 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 210 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 410 GB/s | 153.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |