AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and NVIDIA TITAN Xp videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• 869.1x more texture fill rate: 330.00 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 210 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 163998 vs 72413
• Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 79.32 vs 43.083
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14462 vs 10966
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3686
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 3343
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14462 vs 10966
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3686
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 3343

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp

• Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1405 MHz vs 1156 MHz
• Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1471 MHz
• Around 7% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 3584
• 1157.1x better floating-point performance: 12,150 gflops vs 10.5 TFLOPs
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
• 7.1x more memory clock speed: 11408 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17881 vs 13200
• Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 934 vs 768
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 256.103 vs 184.405
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2513.321 vs 1765.06
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.708 vs 12.606
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1139.382 vs 1022.925
• Around 47% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10128 vs 6879

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	13200 17881
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	768 934
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	163998 72413
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	184.405 256.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1765.06 2513.321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.606 19.708
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	79.32 43.083
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1022.925 1139.382
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14462 10966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3361 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14462 10966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3361 3343
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	6879 10128

Compare specifications (specs)